A real engagement first, then the systems we deploy for new work — on the same stack, inside your own cloud perimeter. Capabilities are shown on synthetic data; we never show client records.
A pan-African paediatric & adolescent HIV treatment network.
Program and clinical data lived in DHIS2 and tenant systems — disaggregated across national, facility, and site levels, but never consolidated into a view stakeholders could act on. Reporting meant manual assembly, and the site-level patterns that drive intervention decisions stayed buried in the source data.
A multi-country health program held data in fundamentally different shapes across its sites — national aggregate reporting in one system, patient-level records in several different clinical systems, and a long tail of program surveys and ad-hoc extracts. Each country spoke a slightly different dialect of the same indicators. No two sources agreed on names, codes, or structure.
Turning a fragmented, multi-system, multi-country data estate into a single conformed foundation that donor-aligned reporting and analytics can trust — the unglamorous engineering that everything downstream depends on.
Program staff and decision-makers needed to ask questions of complex health data in plain language and get trustworthy answers — narrative summaries, visualizations, and trends — without a wrong number ever slipping through. The hard part was never the chat interface. It was the data engineering underneath that lets a language model answer safely.
The engineering discipline behind trustworthy AI on sensitive data — the same "LLM orchestrates, verified services calculate" pattern we build on. A public example of this approach in pediatric-health data is documented in Microsoft's account of the gl-AI-ser system.
A web portal that matches staff to projects by structured skill profiles — a rated-skills catalog, profile intake, project staffing, an approvals workflow, and oversight reporting. Replaces manual, spreadsheet-driven allocation.
A web application managing the full issue lifecycle — intake, triage queue, assignment, remediation activities, and resolution tracking with full audit history. Role-based access and structured tagging by country and program area.
A custom portal wrapping embedded Power BI in a governed access layer — internal SSO plus credentialed external-partner sign-in, and row- and report-level entitlements so each user sees only their country, programme, and organization. Report search, full-screen viewing, and a feedback loop to report owners.
Retrieval-augmented systems grounded in an organization's own data — every answer traces back to source rows and carries a calibrated confidence label, with no hallucinated claims. The reasoning layer behind our program intelligence briefs and conversational reporting.
Where most consultancies sell either strategy decks or pure delivery, we do the advisory work that makes the build worth doing — and can write the funding case that pays for it. Senior-led, grounded in what we actually ship.